GLFW: ziggify the enum declarations #37

Closed
opened 2021-10-24 02:30:23 +00:00 by emidoots · 1 comment
emidoots commented 2021-10-24 02:30:23 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

The way the enums are set up right now is very C-like, should clean this up.

Also consider https://github.com/hexops/mach/pull/27#issuecomment-920735297

The way the enums are set up right now is very C-like, should clean this up. Also consider https://github.com/hexops/mach/pull/27#issuecomment-920735297
Avokadoen commented 2021-10-24 07:57:49 +00:00 (Migrated from github.com)

I'm sorry i never got to this. I'll take a look on it today :)

I'm sorry i never got to this. I'll take a look on it today :)
Sign in to join this conversation.
No milestone
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
The due date is invalid or out of range. Please use the format "yyyy-mm-dd".

No due date set.

Dependencies

No dependencies set.

Reference
hexops/mach#37
No description provided.