glfw: undo setSizeLimits workaround once self-hosted compiler bug is fixed #581
Labels
No labels
CI
all
basisu
blog
bug
build
contributor-friendly
core
correctness
deferred
dev
direct3d-headers
docs
driver-os-issue
duplicate
dxcompiler
editor
examples
experiment
feature-idea
feedback
flac
freetype
gamemode
gkurve
glfw
gpu
gpu-dawn
harfbuzz
help welcome
in-progress
infrastructure
invalid
libmach
linux-audio-headers
long-term
mach
mach.gfx
mach.math
mach.physics
mach.testing
model3d
needs-triage
object
opengl-headers
opus
os/linux
os/macos
os/wasm
os/windows
package-manager
priority
proposal
proposal-accepted
question
roadmap
slipped
stability
sysaudio
sysgpu
sysjs
validating-fix
vulkan-zig-generated
wayland-headers
website
wontfix
wrench
www
x11-headers
xcode-frameworks
zig-update
No project
No assignees
1 participant
Notifications
Due date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference
hexops/mach#581
Loading…
Add table
Add a link
Reference in a new issue
No description provided.
Delete branch "%!s()"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
This is possibly a stage2 bug but I wanted to report here to get another set of eyes. If it is a stage2 bug, would appreciate if you could get an issue up!
On stage1 (
-fstage1) compiles fine. With stage2:I see that Window is already protecting against null so this seems... weird.
I can't reproduce this.
What Zig version are you using? Are you using stage3?
Zig version
0.10.0-dev.4333+f5f28e0d2. Works with stage1, not stage2 (andzigbinary is stage3 yes, an official nightly).So, it very specifically only reproduces with that floatToInt call, if I change that to a comptime-known number it doesn't work. Try this:
I'm trying to get a tighter reproduction now to report a Zig issue, this is clearly that.
I got it: https://github.com/ziglang/zig/issues/13164
A workaround for now if you want is to remove the
inlineif you want to do that until that issue is resolved.Thanks for tracking that down! I added that workaround for now, will leave this issue open for tracking.